Friday, June 19, 2009
Globe and Mail ~ June 19, 2009
The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada will launch program to teach physicians breech vaginal delivery
Carla Wintersgill
Friday, Jun. 19, 2009
Physicians should no longer automatically opt to perform a cesarean section in the case of a breech birth, according to new guidelines by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada.
Released yesterday, the guidelines are a response to new evidence that shows many women are safely able to vaginally deliver babies who enter the birth canal with the buttocks or feet first. Normally, the infant descends head first.
“Our primary purpose is to offer choice to women,” said AndrĂ© Lalonde, executive vice-president of the SOGC.
“More women are feeling disappointed when there is no one who is trained to assist in breech vaginal delivery,” he adds.
Since 2000, C-sections have been the preferred method of delivery in breech births. Studies suggested that breached births were associated with an increased rate of complication when performed vaginally.
As a result, many medical schools have stopped training their physicians in breech vaginal delivery.
The problem now, according to Dr. Lalonde, is that there is a serious shortage of doctors to teach and perform these deliveries.
With the release of the new guidelines, the SOGC will launch a nationwide training program to ensure that doctors will be adequately prepared to offer vaginal breech births .
The new approach was prompted by a reassessment of earlier trials. It now appears that there is no difference in complication rates between vaginal and cesarean section deliveries in the case of breech births.
News of the change is a boon for the Ottawa-based Coalition for Breech Birth.
“We're really, really pleased,” said Robin Guy, co-founder of the coalition.
Ms. Guy started the group after the birth of her second child in the fall of 2006. Although she had given birth to her first child at home with a midwife, Ms. Guy delivered her daughter in the hospital because of the baby's breech position.
“I was cornered into an unneeded and unwanted C-section because the obstetrician that I had didn't have the experience to catch her,” said Ms. Guy.
The aim of the coalition is to ensure that women know what their options are when it comes to breech birth. Ms. Guy believes that many women don't realize that vaginal breech births are even possible.
“Educating women is our primary goal because it takes more than just a guideline change,” she said.
The SOGC stresses that because of complications that may arise, many breech deliveries will still require a cesarean section.
Breech presentations occur in 3-4 per cent of pregnant women who reach term. That translates to approximately 11,000 to 14,500 breech deliveries a year in Canada.
The new decision to offer vaginal breech birth aligns with the SOGC promotion of normal childbirth – spontaneous labour, followed by a delivery that is not assisted by forceps, vacuum or cesarean section. In December of 2008, the society release a policy statement that included its recommendation for a development of national practice guidelines on normal childbirth.
“The safest way to deliver has always been the natural way,” said Dr. Lalonde.
“Vaginal birth is the preferred method of having a baby because a C-section in itself has complications.”
Cesarean sections, in which incisions are made through a mother's abdomen and uterus to deliver the baby, can lead to increased chance of bleeding and infections and can cause further complications for pregnancies later on.
“There's the idea out there in the public sometimes that having a C-section today with modern anesthesia and modern hospitals is as safe as having a normal childbirth, but we don't think so,” said Dr. Lalonde.
“It is the general principle in medicine to not make having a cesarean section trivial.”
The SOGC believes that if a woman is well-prepared during pregnancy, she has the innate ability to deliver vaginally.
The national average for babies delivered via cesarean section in Canada is 25 per cent.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Film Night ~ A Must See for Every Parent to Be
invites you to a special showing of
Ricki Lake's film
The Business of Being Born
Saturday, October 18, 2008
7 pm @ Alpine Bakery
(Admission by Donation)
A must see for every parent to be.
You will never look at giving birth the same way.
Hosted by Yukoners for Funded Midwifery
Sponsored by Alpine Bakery, Due North Delivery, and Copy Copy
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Los Angeles Times ~ July 9, 2008
Big Medicine's blowback on home births
July 9, 2008
It's about time.
Planning a home birth with a midwife may sound old-fashioned -- maybe you think it sounds crazy -- but a solid body of research shows that for healthy women who seek a normal, nonsurgical birth, there are several benefits. At home, a woman can get one-on-one care and monitoring from a midwife trained to support the normal labor process. The mother-to-be is free to move about, eat and drink, sit in a birth tub -- Britain's national health guidelines call water the safest, most effective form of pain relief. A woman will be helped to give birth in positions that are effective and protective: sitting, squatting, on hands and knees, even standing.
The physiological birth process is automatic: hormones fire, the cervix gradually opens, the uterus contracts, the baby descends, muscles engage. An optimal birth, one in which mother and child emerge as healthy as can be, is one that begins spontaneously, progresses on its own and concludes with the least amount of intervention necessary.
This has led to an epidemic of pre-term births in the United States. A 2006 survey showed that the majority of babies are now born before the spontaneous onset of labor, which leaves them more prone to breathing and feeding difficulties. Caesareans are also contributing to a rising maternal death rate, announced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last year.
Which is why some women, such as those in the film Lake produced, choose to give birth somewhere other than a hospital. Their choice is backed by sound science. Studies of "low-risk" women in North America planning out-of-hospital births with midwives have found that 95% give birth vaginally with hardly any medical intervention. The largest and most rigorous study to date, published in the British Medical Journal, found that in North America, babies were born at home just as safely as in the hospital.
Organized medicine can't believe this. Dismissing the research evidence, the AMA resolution states that "the safest setting for labor, delivery and the immediate postpartum period is in the hospital" or an accredited birth center. In its own statement earlier this year, the American College of Ob/Gyns went even further, implying that women who choose home birth are selfish and irresponsible: "choosing to deliver a baby at home ... is to place the process of giving birth over the goal of having a healthy baby."
Compare that to this information in Britain's NHS-issued handout my friend was given at her first prenatal appointment: "There is no evidence to support the common assertion that home birth is a less safe option for women experiencing uncomplicated pregnancies." In a joint statement last year, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Royal College of Midwives said, "There is no reason why home birth should not be offered to women at low risk of complications, and it may confer considerable benefits for them and their families."
The AMA's statement calls for legislation that could be used against women who choose home birth, possibly resulting in criminal child-abuse or neglect charges. The group says this is about safety, but with no credible research to back up its claim, this argument falls flat. Women are simply caught in a turf war over the maternity market, and it would appear that the physicians' groups are perfectly willing to trample the modern medical ethic of patient autonomy -- grounded in our legal rights to self-determination, to liberty and to privacy -- in their grab for control.
If these groups were truly making maternal and child health a priority, they'd be reforming standard maternity care, not strong-arming women into it.
Jennifer Block is the author of "Pushed: The Painful Truth About Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care."
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Midwifery Update
This update is long overdue, as I have been extremely busy with a new baby and a new business. You can read Eowyn's birth story (at home with midwife Christina) in the previous post. My husband and I have started Due North Delivery, a baby and maternity store that offers customers 5% of their purchases as a credit towards doula and midwifery services. We decided to start this business in large part because the government has been slow in funding midwifery services in the Yukon. You can access the store at www.duenorthdelivery.com
The last midwifery working group was held in June, at which time a new policy analyst from Health and Social Services was introduced. I have not yet received any reports or documentation from our meetings, although Health and Social Services should be preparing a document.
I personally feel that Yukoners for Funded Midwifery is at a bit of a crossroads. Having been through the working group meetings and discussing the idea of regulation at length with the midwives, government personnel, medical workers, and other consumers, I do not believe it is in the best interests of women who wish to use midwifery services in the Yukon for midwifery to be regulated. This is mostly because regulation of midwifery in Canada has a history of limiting women's choices surrounding birth with a midwife, which in many cases is contrary to the safety and well-being of the woman and/or her child. However, I would like to see midwifery services become a more accessible choice for women in the Yukon through funding and for midwives to have status at the hospital to better meet the needs of women who either choose a hospital birth or require transport to the hospital.
The government has said repeatedly that the only way to funding is through regulation, but I am wondering if perhaps we should challenge this. What I would ideally like to see is a government program of reimbursement, where the women who receive midwifery services are reimbursed for their bill, rather than the government dealing with the midwives. Does anyone know of any program that would set a precedent for this? I would like to propose to the government that they have a list of midwives (which right now would be the two practicing midwives in the Yukon, Christina and Heather) whose services they will reimburse women for. The Canadian Midwifery Regulators Consortium has a standardized Canadian Midwifery Registration Examination, and the government of the Yukon could require midwives who would like to be on the list to pass this examination. The hospital could establish a set of guidelines or protocol for the interactions between midwives, doctors, nurses, and hospital staff when a midwife is attending a woman at the hospital. Does this seem really outside the realm of possibility? I've always liked to dream big! If you think this would best serve the needs and enable the choices of women in the Yukon please email me back! And come to a meeting! The government takes action in response to what we, the consumers, want and the more the better. We need to figure out a way to really get our voices heard and get the message through that this is what we want. We can discuss ideas at the next meeting.
The next meeting will be on August 26 at 7pm at my house, 17 Redwood St. in Porter Creek. Please feel free to email me at info at yffm dot ca or call me at 456-7711 for directions. We need to hear your voice!Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Eowyn's Birth Story
I had mildly painful contractions on Wednesday night, and during the morning on Thursday, March 20. I let
I drank quite a bit of water and apple juice while I was in labour, and I tried to eat some grapes. Christina had thoughtfully bought me some frozen grapes (I really liked eating frozen things during the pregnancy!). At 5:23 am I went pee on the toilet. Sitting on the toilet during contractions has never worked for me, so I didn’t stay there but got back up and went back to leaning on the washing machine. I really appreciated having the tulips there that my mom had brought; they helped to remind me of beauty in the midst of my pain.
I had a small one degree tear just inside my vagina, which I opted not to get stitched. I guess I did a pretty good job of slowing down, considering I had a third degree tear almost to my anus with Elias’ birth! Because I decided not get stitched I had to mostly lie down with my legs together for a week, which I thought was a good thing anyway to make sure I rested and bonded with Eowyn. Those first few days are so fleeting, and so precious.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
SOGC makes changes to guidelines for vaginal birth of breech babies
Last week, Robin got this great response from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
Dear Ms. Guy:
Thank you very much for your letter dated June 25th, 2008 regarding Breech Birth in Canada. Your letter was perfectly timed as the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada’s (SOGC) Council Committee has just discussed and approved new guidelines that will offer choices to women who want to have a vaginal birth when there is a breech presentation. The breech guideline is now being copy-edited and will be published in the fall in the JOG. At that time, it will become official SOGC policy. A full press release will be prepared and we would be happy to have you, or someone from your group, participate.
The SOGC had a guideline in 1994. In 2000, given the results and the publicity surrounding breech delivery, we felt it was necessary to warn our members about the study and suggested they discuss it with their patients. At no time did the SOGC ever recommend cesarean sections for all breech presentation. I regret these comments reported by physicians and we will certainly work hard to correct these impressions.
The SOGC will also collaborate with the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (APOG) to make sure that Breech Vaginal Delivery is taught properly in all medical schools in Canada.
Thank you very much for sending this information to me, I will circulate this information to SOGC Council. I will also put you on the mailing list for our guidelines, which are printed in the JOGC as well as being available on our website.
Yours Sincerely,
André B. Lalonde, MD, FRCSC, FSOGC, FACS, MSc
Executive Vice-President
Monday, March 31, 2008
Veronika from Dawson - Birth Stories
In
Then I came to
I met Christina Kaiser in seventh month of my pregnancy. We spent whole day, we talked, she loaded me with advice and delicious brownies, checked on the baby, helped with leg-cramps by applying acupuncture. All felt very natural.
The day we arrived to
Most of the necessary checking then went without us noticing – uninterrupted in our joy we spent hours with our new baby before we all hit the bed. It took us almost a month to leave Christina’s little cabin – month full of advice and practical help. Thanks to Christina I turned from literally all-that-everyday-baby-stuff illiterate into quite a confident mum.
… and so when Eva let us know she was there, we did not hesitate about where this one was to be born. But how different two pregnancies can be! While I hardly noticed with
Just like with
It was a long and painful journey completed fully naturally only thanks to Christina. To each of mine “I can’t anymore!” she replied “Yes, you can.” and she would never let go of my hand or stop saying something about a great job :o) After teas, acupuncture and a brisk walk outside, we used an up-and-down the stairs method to enhance the contractions that subsided every time I went for the soothing bath. Eventually, we walked our way back to the pool and after quite a bit of pushing, Eva finally decided to come out. Tom ran in to see her coming,
Unfortunately, as exhausted as I was, I could not take care of Eva right away but there was somebody who did it for me: my midwife. Thank you, Christina, from all my heart!
